Critically analysing research papers

Statement of topic and purpose B. Summary or description of the work III. Discussion of appeal to a particular audience Remember:

Critically analysing research papers

You are expected to read the article carefully, analyse it, and evaluate the quality and originality of the research, as well as its relevance and presentation.

Its strengths and weaknesses are assessed, followed by its overall value. Do not be confused by the term critique: You should address both the positive and negative aspects.

If not, the following steps may help you. These steps are based on a detailed description of how to analyse and evaluate a research article provided by Wood in her lab guide.

This guide is divided into two parts. The second part, "Writing your Critique," discusses two possible ways to structure your critique paper.

Researching the Critique The questions listed under many of the subheadings in this section may provide you with a good place to begin understanding what you are looking for and what form your critique might take.

Review articles summarize and evaluate current studies research articles on a particular topic. Select a review article on a topic that interests you and that is written clearly so you can understand it. Select a Research Article Use the review article to select a research article.

This can be very useful in writing your critique.

Critically analysing research papers

Analyse the Text Read the article s carefully. As you read the article s use the following questions to help you understand how and why the research was carried out. What is the author's central purpose?

Critically analysing research papers

What methods were used to accomplish this purpose systematic recording of observations, analysis and evaluation of published research, assessment of theory? What were the techniques used?

Conducting critical analysis of research

What kind of data can be obtained using each technique? How are such data interpreted? What kind of information is produced by using the technique? What were the results of the study? How was each technique used to obtain each result?

How did each result contribute to answering the question or testing the hypothesis raised in the introduction? How were the results interpreted? Were the author s able to answer the question test the hypothesis raised?Critical Analysis of Research Papers. and depression screening to improve practice but may lack the skills and know how to evaluate the research critically.

Initial Appraisal

Barriers to analysis of the. AN INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PUBLICATIONS IN EXPERIMENTAL BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES THE RESEARCH PAPER IN BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES Scientists publish research reports for a variety of reasons. Ideally, a research report .

Critically Analyzing Information Sources Critical Appraisal and Analysis Search this Guide Search. Critically Analyzing Information Sources: Critical Appraisal Primary sources are the raw material of the research process.

Secondary sources are based on primary sources. For example, if you were researching Konrad Adenauer's role in. Writing a critical review of a journal article can help to improve your research skills.

By assessing the work of others, you develop skills as a critical reader and become familiar with the types of evaluation criteria that will be applied to research in your field and thus your own research. How to Search and Critically Evaluate Research Literature Author Michael Hewitt Revised by Christine Keen The NIHR Research Design Service for Yorkshire & the Humber.

Critical appraisal is a systematic process used to identify the strengths and weaknesses of a research article in order to assess the usefulness and validity of research findings. The most.

How to critically evaluate the quality of a research article? – JEPS Bulletin